Theoretical physics research

What does splitting the atom three ways make possible?

A unified theoretical framework for wormhole energy, FTL propulsion and temporal navigation — with the math shown, every claim honestly labelled, and an open-source simulator that runs today.

How to read our research

Honest labels on every claim

Speculative physics is only useful when you can see exactly where the established science ends. Every result in the BTHL research series carries one of three labels.

Established

Textbook physics

Observed, measured and published — binding energies, three-phase power, special relativity, the Casimir effect.

Engineering

Buildable now or soon

Within reach of current or near-term technology — REBCO superconducting magnets, octupole field geometries, the running simulator.

Theoretical — to-do

Open research targets

Beyond current physics and stated precisely as open problems — never presented as settled.

The Stargate Framework

Four number bases. Four engineering problems.

A working paper by David St. John (ORCID 0009-0000-5077-9751), first published January 2025 — the living edition is maintained at tfr.bthlcorp.com.

base-3

Energy Generation

Optimized ternary nuclear fission and the tri-phase generate → redistribute → recalibrate cycle.

base-8

Field Stabilization

Eight-loop electromagnetic containment with real octupole plasma-confinement lineage.

base-5

Geospatial Navigation

Base-5 encodings for spatial navigation, from orbital mechanics to Mars exploration.

base-17

Temporal Navigation

A prime-numbered temporal lattice that minimizes harmonic overlap and resonance coupling.

The series

Computational analysis

The numbers behind the framework

Ternary fission is real, observed nuclear physics: in roughly 2–4 of every 1,000 thermal-neutron fissions of U-235 the nucleus splits three ways — typically two heavy fragments plus an alpha particle carrying a mean kinetic energy near 16 MeV, with a total Q-value near 200 MeV.

The framework's central energetic claim survives the same binding-energy arithmetic: an idealized symmetric tripartition into fragments near A ≈ 78 releases roughly 15–25% more energy per fission event than the binary split — raising the yield from about 8.2 × 10¹³ J/kg toward ~1.0 × 10¹⁴ J/kg. The three-way split is energetically favored, not forbidden.

The open problem is stated precisely: tripartition is suppressed dynamically, not energetically. Which excitation conditions, target nuclei or field environments enhance the tripartition branching ratio is the project's core research question — with validation against Geant4 and MCNP as the next step.

Feasibility ledger
ComponentBasisStatus
Ternary fission (observed channel)0.2–0.4% of fissions, α + two fragmentsEstablished
Tripartition energy advantage (~15–25%)Binding-energy arithmeticEstablished
Inducing tripartition at scaleFission barrier dynamicsTheoretical
Tri-phase constant-power deliveryThree-phase power mathematicsEstablished
8-loop, 5–10 T superconducting containmentREBCO magnets, octupole lineageEngineering
Morris-Thorne wormhole + exotic matterGeneral relativityTheory est., budget open
Negative energy (Casimir, squeezed vacuum)Measured in laboratoryEstablished
Gram-scale / positive-energy geometriesVan den Broeck, Lentz solitonsTheoretical
Base-5 / Base-17 navigation encodingsSR/GR terms exact; extensions openMixed
Conservation-verified event simulatorC++/Go, open sourceRunning today

Feasibility ledger reproduced from the Computational Analysis & Feasibility paper.

Making the mathematics executable

The Ternary Fission Reactor simulator

A high-performance C++17 physics engine with a Go REST API, WebSocket telemetry and a live dashboard — running in a container at tfr.bthlcorp.com.

  • Conservation-verified ternary fission events (mass, energy, momentum, charge)
  • Energy fields with round-based dissipation and entropy tracking
  • Portal-load simulation with projected power and duration
  • Prometheus metrics and real-time WebSocket monitoring
  • Open source: github.com/davestj/ternary-fission-reactor
Ternary Fission Reactor
Scientific method

How we do research

  1. Ask a precise questionOpen problems are stated as testable questions — "what enhances the tripartition branching ratio?" — not as conclusions.
  2. Separate the known from the proposedEvery claim is labelled established, engineering or theoretical before it is published.
  3. Make it executableWhere the math can be run, it is — in open-source code anyone can inspect, build and challenge.
  4. Measure with real instrumentsBaselines before every session, calibration data with every capture, real device data only — no synthesized readings.
  5. Preserve the evidenceSHA-256 fingerprinting at intake and a full chain-of-custody trail for every artifact.
  6. Review, then publishPeer review before publication, and corrections published openly when we are wrong.

Collaborate on the open problems

Nuclear physicists, simulation engineers and theorists: the hardest questions in this framework are stated precisely — and open.